Human resources management: how to implement a successful strategy

Why judging successful HR management against pre-defined benchmarks may not necessarily provide an accurate picture of progress

This article is based on research by Jordi Trullén

Human resource management in organizations affect both SMEs and large companies, but there are few studies that analyze its implementation in detail. It is important to understand what human resource management is, as this allows companies to adapt their strategies and processes to achieve greater organizational success and efficiency.

The actions required by human resource management to meet strategic objectives, innovate and manage change are often widely discussed. However, although human resource management is essential for successful business performance, its implementation process remains a concept with a very vague meaning.

To illustrate how this process is carried out, examples of human resource management can be used to show the practical application of policies and strategies in various companies.

To address this gap, Jordi Trullén, Associate Professor in Esade's Department of People Management and Organisation, and co-authors Anna Bos-Nehles (University of Twente) and Mireia Valverde (Rovira i Virgili University) conducted an academic study into the process of HR management implementation. Together, they have provided a definition and a measure of effectiveness that could provide clarity on the practice and form a solid basis for future research.

Human resources management processes: From the board of directors to its implementation

Implementation is a dynamic process across many disciplines. When a strategic goal is decided upon, the leader of every department within a firm must filter down those goals, translate them into actions and develop them into outcomes for individual employees. Underpinning this business-wide process is HR management implementation.

This is where human resource management, optimization, and organization plays a critical role, allowing policies and practices to be structured efficiently to achieve maximum performance from work teams.

It is essential to know how to manage human resources effectively to ensure that all departments and employees are aligned with the organization's objectives and can achieve their individual and collective goals.

Yet, despite businesses broadly adopting similar HR management policies and practices, results very vary wildly. This suggests that it is not the practices that are implemented which have an impact, but rather how they are delivered.

Policies can be created in a boardroom by qualified practitioners, but if line managers with less knowledge apply them incorrectly (or not at all), they will have little value.

To avoid this, strategic human resources management is crucial, as it involves not only the creation of policies, but also their effective integration into the company's overall strategy, ensuring that all levels of the organization work towards the same goal.

Effective HR management
Related content: 3 strategies to make Human Resources departments more effective

This is where the importance of implementation comes sharply into focus: how will those policies be received and acted upon by the very people they are designed to govern and protect? What specific roles, goals and outcomes will need to be generated, developed and executed by every HR professional, senior manager, line manager and frontline employee?

Keys to the implementation of integrated human resources management

Implementation has been variously described as a conceptual process, a fixed end result, part of a design process, or a set of specific actions by line managers. An "implemented" HR management practice is often simply equated to a "successfully implemented" or "effectively implemented" HR management practice, with no focus on the process that led to the end result.

HR management practices can change throughout the lifecycle of the process of delivering the goals of a business strategy. As line managers and employees negotiate the actions required for their own individual outcomes, issues may arise requiring adjustment of practice.

On the other hand, it is crucial to have effective human resource management tools to facilitate the management of policies and practices within the company.

Human Resource management implementation is a dynamic process across many disciplines and departments

Defining HR management implementation as simply being successfully or unsuccessfully achieved ignores the possibility that several obstacles may have been identified and addressed with positive results.

In this process, which must necessarily be fluid, considering the implementation of human resources as successful, using only pre-defined criteria as a reference, does not necessarily provide an accurate view of its progress or achievements. Consequently, in order to assess the effectiveness - or failure - of the HR implementation process, it is necessary to identify the elements involved.

This necessary fluidity means that judging successful HR management implementation against pre-defined benchmarks may not necessarily provide an accurate picture of progress or achievements. Instead, in order to judge the effectiveness – or failure – of an HR management implementation process, we need to identify the elements within it.

Human resource management functions

HR management implementation is a dynamic process that starts with the decision to introduce a new (or significantly change an existing) HR management policy or practice. During this introduction, relevant HR management actors – such as line managers, HR specialists, user employees – engage with the policy or practice, interacting among themselves and attempting to shape it to fit their requirements and needs, until it becomes routinised.

HR management
A successful HR management implementation involves active help from several departments (Photo: @andreeas/Twenty20)

This definition includes five core functions:

  1. A dynamic process. HR management processes that evolve during implementation, being modified and refined so they can be used more effectively.
  2. From adoption to routinisation. When implementation takes place, beginning when the decision to introduce a policy or practice is made and ending when it’s used in a routine fashion.
  3. A new policy or practice. A policy or practice that is new to the unit implementing it, even if it’s been adopted by others elsewhere, or that it has been significantly modified and reintroduced.
  4. A focus on multiple actors. All organisational stakeholders who may directly or indirectly engage with the new practice at any level, including line managers, HR professionals, frontline workers and external people such as outsource vendors, consultants, or trade union officials.
  5. Interactions among actors. How each individual collectively comes together to deliver the policy or practice.

With a definition of HR management implementation, effectiveness can be measured as occurring when the relevant organisational actors use an HR management policy or practice consistently, skilfully, and in ways that are congruent with its original purpose, even if the policy or practice has been modified during the implementation process.

Again, several considerations are needed to better understand this proposed definition.

  • Distinguishing process from outcome. The outcome of implementation can only be evaluated once the implementation process is over; when the policy or practice has become routine, or when it is abandoned and considered a failed implementation.
  • Consistent and skilful use. The extent to which individuals use the practice, and how well.
  • Congruent with its original purpose. How the implemented practice differs from the one originally designed. Modification of the practice may be part of the implementation process, but effective implementation cannot involve the loss of one or more core features of the practice or idea being implemented.

Perhaps little work has been done on this subject because implementation is intuitively interpreted as the process of putting a human resource management idea or plan into practice, or because it is often associated with a problem of the professionals who carry it out.

This definition provides a basis for both researchers and practitioners to build on and define successful HR management implementation.


Original research publication: Trullen J, Bos-Nehles A & Valverde M. From intended to actual and beyond: a cross-disciplinary view of human resource management implementation. International Journal of Management Reviews, 22, 150-176 (2020)

All written content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.